Implementing IMC at lower levels of theoretical models

Implementing IMC at lower levels of theoretical modelsThis report is about the subroutine of combine trade communication theory in the grocerying industry, in item foc utilize on the non-homogeneous descriptions that exist for IMC. My report in desire manner investigates why organisations choose non to approach IMC or if they do why they shape up to precisely implement it at the lower levels of the theoretical models and non ride it further. I result do this by discussing IMC in a mannequin of ways and looking at organisations as examples, whilst considering m any(prenominal) academics views on IMC and its coming(prenominal) from the some journals I accommodate read. integrated trade Communications is the consolidation of any swap parley tools and sources from within a party rate in conjunction in rove to create a run for that maximizes the feign on consumers with minimal cost. The market converses mix is the out situated point of IMC and the end aim to achieve is to maintain strong communication d wholenessout the telephoner and customers. The market mix consists of the following tools advertising, direct market, unexclusive dealing, personal merchandising and sales promotion. The goal is to combine every(prenominal) these tools on with the organisations message and some other aspects of the trade mix, in order to all over arrest any competitors.The definitional concern of IMC has been an ongoing problem amongst the academics. thither atomic itemize 18 a turn tail of divers(a) definitions some of which ar contrasting, although even those with similar points vary enormously in terms of proficiency and simplicity.Schulz and Schulz (1998) introduced a modernistic definition which in the opinions of others admits both the current and future features of IMC. This definition emphasises the strategic aspects and refers to IMC as a business figure out instead of simply the combining of marketing tools. Althoug h this definition is masteryful Kliatchko studyd that for it to be complete it must not limit the grasp of IMC to the strategic management of doubled audiences or markets, multiple channels and fiscal results, as it is in that respectfore leaving out intent-or-death con ten-spott which is obtained and delivered through the IMC process. Although it could be argued that this is implied in the term marketing communication, Kliatchko felt it was classic to be stated to a fault. This new definition besides implements the term business process which was previously introduced by Schultz and Schultz (1998). Kliatchko (2005) play offs tremendously with this term and explains that it perfectly describes the core of desegregation. In addition it also supports the findings of Jones et al. (2004) and convey (2002) that IMC has advanced from purely creation a communication process to a management process.IMC is an audience-driven business process of strategically managing stakehold ers, content, channels and results of speck communication programs Kliatchko (2008). One key difference in the midst of Kliatchko and the Schultz and Schultz (1998) definition is the use of the term business processes, Kliatchko highlights how it is audience driven on order to reinforce the view that IMC gives to solid publics.Fill concentrates on the descent with audiences, IMC is a strategic approach to the planned management of an organisations communication theory. IMC requires that organisations coordinate their various strategies, resources and messages in order that it engages coherently and meaningfully with taper audiences. The main part is to develop sexual relationships with audiences that be of mutual value (Fill 2005). Whereas Kotler (2003) focuses on how the market is perceive by the public a way of looking at the full marketing process from the view point from the viewpoint of the customer. There be then extremely opposing viewpoints such as that make by C ornelissen and Lock (2000) that IMC is unsloped a victimize term management fashion.The concept of merged marketing communication theory has become an essential part of the market in terms of communication strategies for companies moreover cod to the definition ever much than changing it prevents IMC being developed and understood to a full extent.The changes that nurse taken place over modern old age have highlighted the qualification of the current marketing practices. It is viewed that in that respect is a need for change if any future challenges be going to be met. The momentum for this adaptation in the industry has al around certainly been strongest in the larger fast contemptible consumer orientated organisations. There is no doubt that integrated marketing communication is not easily achieved, and can therefore lead to failure, however when undecomposed correctly it can have extremely successful results. IMC is a significant and essential theme (Cornelisse n and Lock 2001) for a variety of reasons, it is exclusively crucial to consider both the advantages and the barriers. coordinated Marketing Communications involves a big(p) deal of work, although when this effort is put in it brings achievement. It gives the company an edge over their competition which leads to an increase in profit, whilst in the long run it saves coin and time due to the cookery. IMC has been defined by Kotler (1996) as a technique to produce more consistent and successful communication theory throughout a whole company.The main benefit of IMC go away be to achieve the desire goal of marketing communications by an individual organisation, however swell up known academics have developed their own lists of specific advantages to using IMC. Linton and Morleys (1995) ten potential benefits of integrated marketing communications atomic number 18 shown below.Creative fair playOperational efficiencyConsistent messagesCost SavingsUnbiased marketing recommendati onsHigh- Calibre consistent serviceBetter use of MediaEasier working relationsGreater Marketing PositionGreater agency accountability bod 1.1 (Linton and Morley)Linton and Morley demonstrate ten advantages of the use of IMC here, which gives a guideline to why IMC is to be encouraged and how it will benefit organisations, however some of the points are somewhat vague and may be misinterpreted for example unbiased marketing recommendations. Fill (2006) on the other hand however lists eight, further both sets of lists include similar points which demonstrate how confident some academics are in the advantages of IMC. match to Kuczynski (1992), success of desegregation occurs with consistency in picky in the companys message. Tynan (1994) also believes this and goes on to explain that for IMC to be achieved not only is it through media being combined but he reiterates the importance of the consumer receiving one recognize message. A comprehensible message has much more of an impac t and will arise out in the mind of a customer over the hundreds of other adverts that surround an individual every day. Un-integrated communications will develop incommensur competent messages which will make them less credible. Duncan and Everett (1993) also consider that consistency in the marketing communication elements will prevent any impending conflicts.IMC also incorporates all the various communications in order for the customer to mature through the steps of the buying process and cultivates the relationship with the customers. This relationship ensures a sense of brand loyalty and consumers will therefore feel safer with this particular brand and therefore remain with them. This ability of accomplishing a customer for life is a very strong advantage over competitors. Duncan and Everett (1993) believe that IMC leads to a decrease in media waste and therefore the company gains this competitive edge. This was also reinforced by Linton and Morleys (1995) ten potential ben efits. Organisations have identified that it is comme il faut increasingly harder to maintain consumers loyalty, which is why integrated marketing communications is important in a technique to gain advantage over any competitors. Regardless of ample investments these complicated relationships mingled with a business multiple marketing comms. are not completely understood. Research shows that the positive do of combining media for example print advertising and television looks promising and that a change is taking place. Another set of research illustrates that 20 years ago 75% of marketing budgets in America was inserted into mass advertising, whereas today 50% goes towards trade promotions, 25% into consumer promotions and only 25% into advertising, which is a huge decline of 50% (Kitchen, 2003).Money is another issue related to IMC. It saves property in the long run however many organisations do not appreciate the long term values of integrated marketing communications and th erefore fail to see it as an investment. This appears to be slowly changing though due to the fact the importance of brand value is change state more common knowledge. Tortorici suggests that one of the easiest ways to maximise its return on an investment is through the use of IMC. (Tortorici 1991) He would have suggested this for a number of reasons such as agency fees being geldd, as it becomes possible for one agency to handle all the communications, and also because it eliminates replication in various areas in the company such as logos, graphics and photography that the company intends to use. In the industrial product market, IMC frequently takes the form of personal selling with advertising. This combination was seen as beneficial due to the decrease in selling cost (Morrill 1970) and a report terminate by the McGraw-Hill Corporation in 1987 came to the same conclusion plus the evidence that it also reduced the step of sales calls to the industrial decision makers. One ex ample of this is IBM, there customer contact costs decreased enormously. (Moretti 1994). Belch and Belch (2001) believe that the benefits of adopting IMC do not just stop at limiting the operating costs but an optimistic attitude and concern for the company are just as significant. Overall all of this would in actual fact reduce the workload and save money long term, however most budgets set in a company are set with only short term in consideration.Despite its many benefits, incorporated Marketing Communications has barriers to overcome just like the money issue just discussed. There are a number of other barriers that authors have identified. For example Ewing et al quoted It has been suggested that departments can develop territorialism because they do not want to change their useful standing. (Ewing et al.,1997.) Schultz also goes on to say that they may be reluctant for this change because of a lack of apprehensiveness of IMC (Schultz 1996). This could start to explain why co mpanies do not use IMC when perhaps it would in fact be prehend for them to.Whats more, problems with executing and measurement have been exemplified by several authors (Eagle et al., 1998). Implementation of IMC is tough to achieve but it also hard to distinguish where to start planning wise. It has been discussed whether promotional activities should beat by examining external factors of the customers offset printing. Although this is clearly a barrier, it does not necessarily mean that it should discourage everyone, as practice makes perfect to wee a great outcome.Another issue that has arisen is the structure of companies which makes it difficult for integration. Organisations are generally subdivided in areas, and although joint assignments may help to break smoothen these organisational barriers the hierarchical structures will still be an issue (Gonring 2000). Pickton and Hartley (1998) also agree with the idea that the implementation has proven exceedingly complicated due to these organisational barriers.Integrated communications has not caught on to many companies(Pettigrew 2001), for a number of reasons for the first time the barriers of IMC contribute to this, however after the previous discussion there are ways to overcome the barriers and there are in fact more advantages to it so the question is why is it not being adopted. The debate of what marketing communications can accomplish has been a big question for many years (Ambler 2000). I will look at what various practitioners believe and also the main reasons why IMC has not taken off as much as it perhaps should have (Pettigrew 2001).Marketers dont generally seem to like change in regards to new investments and approach to their marketing communications due to a fear of change (Gonring 2000), which is therefore an issue in relation to adopting IMC. Although they may realise that as applied science is growing the importance for companies to be organised and consistent is also increasing ( Cornelissen 2003).A lack of understanding of Integrated Marketing Communications is also another factor to why IMC is highly recognised but is not necessarily chosen to be used. This shortage of knowledge must be addressed before managers are expected to use integrated marketing. This all stems from the fact that there are many different views on whether IMC is here to stay or whether it is just a fad. Cornelissen and Lock state that IMC is nothing new but only a management fad (Cornelissen and Lock 2000), this is severely disagreed with by most other practitioners who see IMC as the future for example IMC is a new brand concept for the emerging digitalised environment (Shultz and kitchen 2000).There are also so many different definitions which can make it confusing from the beginning, in time with all of these reasons considered the main weakness of IMC still lies in the apparent unfitness of agencies to measure behavioural outcomes.This major issue of not being able to measure th e effects of an integrated campaign is majorly delaying the implementation process and there is a lack of empirical studies into how it could be measured. Indicating how IMC could move into full implementation is a huge concern, measurement and evaluation corresponds to an extra cost to organisations. These organisations will have built up thorough behavioural databases of their consumers however it would be unfair to access these unless an extremely strong relationship had been developed.Overall, it would seem that integrated marketing communications have developed greatly, but there are still many issues to overcome in order to for IMC to be completed successfully achieved in companies. It is important for this to occur as it has been defined by Chang et al.(1991) that consumers attend more to integrated marketing communication than a average advertising campaign.One model used is the quartette pillars of IMC by Kliatchko these quatern pillars are the elements on which IMC level s are based, they are content, channels, stakeholders and results.For full implementation of IMC, firms must use all four levels (Schultz and Schultz 1998). Although each pillar is separate there is a present of each of the four levels, just each have their own most prominent section.The end goal of Content is mainly to deliver a consistent message for utmost communication impact (Duncan Caywood 1996).The objective is therefore for the target audience (stakeholders) to receive a clear integrated message. If this desired goal is achieved then integration at the first level has been achieved. A good example of this is Haagen Dazs ice cream. They use observational aggregations to their audience which communicates a sense of fun and pleasure, which is consistent through all of other campaigns.Pillar two is all related to the channels of communication, not just in its general sense but also in the view of the customer, in order to obtain what customers prefer. This allows appropriate content to get together effectively with the audience. The ability to connect with a target audience in a way in which they prefer and deliver the message fit in to their terms would be successful IMC at this level. BT attempted to do this in their 1998 World Cup Football tournament. They took advantage of the football in order to make their advert more relevant and appealing to the public, this would have made it more inte succoring for the public who were interested in football but not for the rest of their target audience.The third pillar is applying information technology for the benefit of both the company and consumers. If the company uses IT to gain a purify understanding of their customers and then they can manage databases of information. This better knowledge will allow them to obtain better relationships with consumers by combining the other pillars, more targeted messages by their preferred channels. This provides a more profitable future for the company (Schultz and Schultz 1998). Gillette Mach 3 achieved this as they produced an advert that utilised a functional appeal and communicate the brands specific attributes capable of solving consumers consumption-related problems. They therefore took into consideration what they target audience wanted to be delivered to them and how whilst making them a profit, this was successful IMC at this level.The final pillar is strategic integration and results. If a company gets to this ramification of integration then they have a good understanding of the demands of integration and what is necessary. Schultz and Schultz (1998) categorise this pillar as the one that allows a company to read more precisely the relation between returns and investments made in the marketing communications campaign. This is why this is the fourth pillar, as it is prominently the measurement of results which as discussed earlier is extremely hard to achieve, hence why my organisations only implement IMC at the lower levels of mod els such as this.Another IMC model is demo below and was designed by Pickton and Broderick (2000).This is a much simpler model however it does look at how integration starts off tactical and ends up strategic.Bupas recent marketing strategy was to reposition the company and integrate its offering. The core brand proposal Bupa the personal health service was announced through a number of Medias such as TV, press, radio sponsorship and PR. The website was a huge success and played a key office staff in its integrated communications by offering online quotes and support. This promotion created awareness of the brand and increased their sales. The concourse Marketing Director quoted we have succeeded in positioning Bupa as the only dedicated independent health care specialist in the UK. ( Marketing Business 2002)Schultz also developed heptad levels of integration model. The 7 levels of integration areAwareness of need for IMC the starting point of the model, realisation.Image- con sistency between media.Functional Forming marketing communication programmes in order to achieve certain aims.Co-ordinated Personal selling is integrated with other elements in order to endure consistency.Personal selling is directly integrated with other elements of marketing communications to ensure consistency between impersonal and interpersonal forms of communication.Consumer-based Understanding the consumers necessarily and wants, this is like the second pillar of Kliatchkos model.Stakeholder- recognition of stakeholders after the final customers. blood management.A good example of complete IMC that could have applied the seven levels of integration is Coco Cola. It is one of the worlds most famous brand name calling and was given the title of leading brand recognition in 2003 by the Business week. Coca Cola represents major emotional advantages over all its competitors, whilst given the customers what they want. They are a loyal brand who creates consistent messages cr ossways their adverts and their message is always clear. They also produce spectacular adverts and have a strong brand image and logo, therefore they are incorporating lot of the seven levels of integration and it is obvious that they are doing successfully.It is clear that IMC plays a vital role in the industry and everyday more is being learnt and understood. A clearer personation of Integrated Marketing is emerging and therefore future companies will begin to adopt it and take it to further levels of the theoretical models rather than just using it at the lower levels. It was established that due to a lack of understanding, and the rest of the barriers, this is the reason why companies only implement at the lower levels. The trouble of IMC makes organisations reluctant however in the future if it is the path they must take to develop their company then IMC will evolve.Ambler, T. (2000), Persuasion, pride and prejudice how ads work, external ledger of publicizing, Vol. 19 zero (prenominal) 3, pp. 299-315.Belch, G.E. and Belch, M.A. (2001), Advertising and Promotion, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin,New York, NY, pp. 10, 78-79.Chang, D.-R., Hahn, M. and Ik-Tae K., (1991) Consumer repartee to Coupons with Advertising in a Pretesting Context, workings Paper, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.Cornelissen, J.P. and Lock, A.R. (2000), Theoretical concept or management fashion? Examiningthe significance of IMC, Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40 no(prenominal) 5, pp. 7-15.Cornelissen, J.P. and Lock, A.R. (2001), The appeal of integration managing communications inmodern organisations, Marketing cognizance Planning, Vol. 19 no(prenominal) 6, pp. 425-31.Cornelissen, J.P. (2003), Change, continuity and progress the concept of integrated marketingcommunications and marketing communications practice, Journal of Strategic Marketing,Vol. 11 none 4, pp. 217-34.Duncan, T. and Everett, S.E. (1993), Client perceptions of integrated marketingcommunications, Journal of Ad vertising Research, Vol. 33 No. 3, p. 30.Duncan, T. and Caywood, C. (1996), The Concept, Process, and Evolution of Integrated MarketingCommunication, Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Duncan, T.R. Caywood, C.L. (1996) The concept, process, and evolution of integrated marketing communications, in Thorson, E. Moore, J. (eds) Integrated Communication Synergy of Persuasive Voices. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 13-34.Eagle, L., Hyde, K., Fourie, W., Padisetti, M. and Kitchen, P. (1998) Revisiting the Concept of Integrated Marketing Communications Contrasting Perceptions Between Marketers and Advertising Agency Executives, opus prepared for 3rd global Conference on Marketing and corporate Communication, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.Ewing, M. T., de Bussey, N. and Ramaseshan, B. (1997) The Power and Politics of Integrated Marketing Communications, Curtin Business School Working Paper, November, 1-18.Ewing, M.T., Du Pleiss, E. Foster, C. (2001) Cinema advertising re- considered. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(1), pp. 78-85.Fill, C. (2002) Marketing Communications Contexts, Strategies and Applications (3rd edn). capital of the United Kingdom Prentice Hall.Fill, C. (2002), Marketing Communications, Contexts, Strategies and Applications, 3rd ed.,Prentice Hall Europe, Hemel Hempstead, p. 32.Fill (2006) invoke Slides, MKT2011.Gonring, M.P. (2000), Global megatrends push IMC concepts to forefront of strategic businessthinking, Journal of Integrated Communications, Vol. 2000-2001, pp. 15-18.Holm, O. (2006), Integrated marketing communication from tactics to strategy, CorporateCommunications An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 23-33.Jerry Kliatchko. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct a revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising. 27 (1), 1-13Jones, G.S., Li, T., Kitchen, P.J. Brignell, J. (2004) The emergence of IMC a theoretical perspective. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(1), pp. 19-30.Kitchen, P.J. Schultz, D.E. (1999) A multi-country comparison of the drive for IMC. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(1), pp. 21-38Kitchen, P.J. Schultz, D.E. (2001) Raising the Corporate Umbrella Corporate Communication in the twenty-first Century. New York PalgravePublishers Ltd.Kliatchko, J.G. (2005) Towards a new definition of integrated marketing communications (IMC). International Journal of Advertising, 24(1), pp. 7-34.Kotler, P. (1996) Principles of Marketing, 7th edn, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Kotler, P. (2000), Marketing Management, 10th ed., Prentice-Hall International, London, p. 7, 19.Kuczynski, A. (1992) beyond Advertising, Towards Integration, Marketing, 13, 50-53.Linton, I. And Morley, K. (1995), Integrated marketing Communications. Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann.Marketing Business (2002), Strong Vital Signs, family line 14.Moretti, P. (1994) Telemarketers Serve Clients, Business Marketing, April, 27-29.Morrill, J. E. (1970) Industrial Advertising Pays Off,Harvard Bus iness Review, March/April, 4.Pettigrew, L.S. (2001a), If IMC is so good why isnt it being implemented?, Journal of IntegratedCommunications, No. 35.Pettigrew, L.S. (2001b), If IMC is so good why isnt it being implemented?, Journal of IntegratedCommunications, No. 36.Pickton, D. Hartley, B. (1998) Measuring integration an assessment of the quality of integrated marketing communication. International Journal of Advertising, 17(4), pp. 447-465.Schultz, D.E. Schultz, H.F. (1998) Transitioning marketing communication into the twenty-first century. Journal of MarketingCommunications, 4(1), pp. 9-26.Schultz, D.E. Schultz, H.F. (2005) Measuring brand value, in Tybout, A. Calkins, T. (eds) Kellog on Branding. New Jersey throne Wiley Sons, Inc.Tortorici, A. J. (1991) Maximising Marketing Communications through Horizontal and Vertical Orchestration, exoteric Relations Quarterly, 36, 20-22.Tynan, K. (1994) Multi-channel Marketing MaximisingMarket Share with an Integrated Marketing Strate gy,Probus, Danvers, MA.